AVEN: a novel oncogenic biomarker with prognostic significance and implications of AVEN-associated immunophenotypes in lung adenocarcinoma.

Introduction: AVEN, an apoptosis and caspase activation inhibitor, has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes and poor prognosis in Acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Targeting AVEN in AML improves apoptosis sensitivity and chemotherapy efficacy, making it a promising therapeutic target. However, AVEN's role has not been studied in solid tumors. Therefore, our study investigated AVEN as a prognostic biomarker in a more comprehensive manner and developed an AVEN-derived prognostic model in Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Method: Pan-cancer analysis was performed to examine AVEN expression in 33 cancer types obtained from the TCGA database. GEPIA analysis was used to determine the predictive value of AVEN in each cancer type with cancer-specific AVEN expression. Lung Adenocarcinomas (LUAD) patients were grouped into AVENhigh and AVENlow based on AVEN expression level. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and pathway enrichment analysis were performed to gain insight into the biological function of AVEN in LUAD. In addition, several deconvolution tools, including Timer, CIBERSORT, EPIC, xCell, Quanti-seq and MCP-counter were used to explore immune infiltration. AVEN-relevant prognostic genes were identified by Random Survival Forest analysis via univariate Cox regression. The AVEN-derived genomic model was established using a multivariate-Cox regression model and GEO datasets (GSE31210, GSE50081) were used to validate its prognostic effect. Results: AVEN expression was increased in several cancer types compared to normal tissue, but its impact on survival was only significant in LUAD in the TCGA cohort. High AVEN expression was significantly correlated with tumor progression and shorter life span in LUAD patients. Pathway analysis was performed with 838 genes associated with AVEN expression and several oncogenic pathways were altered such as the Cell cycle, VEGFA-VEGFR2 pathway, and epithelial-mesenchymal-transition pathway. Immune infiltration was also analyzed, and less infiltrated B cells was observed in AVENhigh patients. Furthermore, an AVEN-derived genomic model was established, demonstrating a reliable and improved prognostic value in TCGA and GEO databases. Conclusion: This study provided evidence that AVEN is accumulated in LUAD compared to adjacent tissue and is associated with poor survival, high tumor progression, and immune infiltration alteration. Moreover, the study introduced the AVEN-derived prognostic model as a promising prognosis tool for LUAD.

SOCS3 Attenuates Dexamethasone-Induced M2 Polarization by Down-Regulation of GILZ via ROS- and p38 MAPK-Dependent Pathways.

Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) have emerged as potential regulators of macrophage function. We have investigated mechanisms of SOCS3 action on type 2 macrophage (M2) differentiation induced by glucocorticoid using human monocytic cell lines and mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages. Treatment of THP1 monocytic cells with dexamethasone (Dex) induced ROS generation and M2 polarization promoting IL-10 and TGF-ß production, while suppressing IL-1ß, TNF-α and IL-6 production. SOCS3 over-expression reduced, whereas SOCS3 ablation enhanced IL-10 and TGF-ß induction with concomitant regulation of ROS. As a mediator of M2 differentiation, glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) was down-regulated by SOCS3 and up-regulated by shSOCS3. The induction of GILZ and IL-10 by Dex was dependent on ROS and p38 MAPK activity. Importantly, GILZ ablation led to the inhibition of ROS generation and anti-inflammatory cytokine induction by Dex. Moreover, GILZ knock-down negated the up-regulation of IL-10 production induced by shSOCS3 transduction. Our data suggest that SOCS3 targets ROS- and p38-dependent GILZ expression to suppress Dex-induced M2 polarization.

Bondsteel fixed partial denture: a provisional indirect technique for in-the-field dental emergencies.

This article presents a modified resin-bonded fixed partial denture technique of replacing a single missing anterior tooth under limitation of material and time. This technique involved a small section of an oral surgery arch bar that was bent and fitted passively into the grooves that were prepared in the lingual of the abutment teeth. A polycarbonate crown was fitted passively on the arch bar by a thin layer of Vaseline. The polycarbonate crown was then filled with acrylic resin to bond the polycarbonate crown and the arch bar together. The result provides an esthetic appearance and a 4-month clinical success without complication. Thus, this technique is a short-term solution for clinics that have limited resources for a definitive treatment.